hardwood: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.59
, type
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, flooring
Weight: 0.52
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.75
, teak
Weight: 0.71
, ash
Weight: 0.61
, ebony
Weight: 0.50
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
be better for environment 0.83
is stronger 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ebony, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mahogany, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(mahogany, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mahogany, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ebony, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(ebony, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(hardwood, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(hardwood, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hardwood, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be better for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(hardwood, is stronger)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hardwood, is stronger)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(hardwood, is stronger)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is stronger)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hardwood, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(ebony, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mahogany, has quality good)