hardwood: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.59
, type
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, flooring
Weight: 0.52
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.75
, teak
Weight: 0.71
, ash
Weight: 0.61
, ebony
Weight: 0.50
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
is cheaper 0.86
be used in more expensive furniture 0.84
be more expensive than softwoods 0.81
be used in expensive furniture 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hardwood, is more expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(flooring, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hardwood, is more expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(product, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hardwood, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(flooring, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(product, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(flooring, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(ebony, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mahogany, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(teak, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(flooring, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(product, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(teak, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(teak, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(ebony, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(ebony, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(mahogany, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mahogany, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(hardwood, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hardwood, is expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hardwood, is expensive)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(hardwood, is expensive)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(hardwood, is cheaper)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hardwood, be used in more expensive furniture)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(hardwood, be used in more expensive furniture)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be used in more expensive furniture)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(hardwood, is cheaper)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hardwood, is cheaper)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hardwood, be used in expensive furniture)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hardwood, be used in expensive furniture)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be used in expensive furniture)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be used in more expensive furniture)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is cheaper)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be used in expensive furniture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hardwood, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flooring, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(product, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ebony, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(teak, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mahogany, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(flooring, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(hardwood, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(product, is cheaper)