hardwood: be more expensive than softwoods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.59
, type
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, flooring
Weight: 0.52
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.75
, teak
Weight: 0.71
, ash
Weight: 0.61
, ebony
Weight: 0.50
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than softwoods 1.00
be better than softwoods 0.97
be harder than softwoods 0.95
be stronger than softwoods 0.94
be more expensive than softwood 0.83
is more expensive 0.81
be called hardwoods 0.80
be used in more expensive furniture 0.79
be stronger than softwood 0.78
be better than softwood 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hardwood, be called hardwoods)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be called hardwoods)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(hardwood, be used in more expensive furniture)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be used in more expensive furniture)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hardwood, be called hardwoods)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(hardwood, be used in more expensive furniture)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be used in more expensive furniture)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, is more expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hardwood, is more expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hardwood, is more expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be called hardwoods)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(hardwood, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)