hardwood: be stronger than softwood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.59
, type
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, flooring
Weight: 0.52
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.75
, teak
Weight: 0.71
, ash
Weight: 0.61
, ebony
Weight: 0.50
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stronger than softwood 1.00
be better than softwood 0.98
be more expensive than softwood 0.96
be different from softwood 0.96
be stronger than softwoods 0.84
be better than softwoods 0.81
be harder than softwoods 0.80
be more expensive than softwoods 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hardwood, be different from softwood)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(hardwood, be different from softwood)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be different from softwood)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be different from softwood)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)