hardwood: be harder than softwoods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.59
, type
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, flooring
Weight: 0.52
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.75
, teak
Weight: 0.71
, ash
Weight: 0.61
, ebony
Weight: 0.50
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harder than softwoods 1.00
be better than softwoods 0.96
be stronger than softwoods 0.95
be more expensive than softwoods 0.95
be more expensive than softwood 0.80
be stronger than softwood 0.80
be better than softwood 0.79
be called hardwoods 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hardwood, be called hardwoods)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hardwood, be called hardwoods)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be called hardwoods)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be called hardwoods)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)