hardwood: be better than softwoods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.59
, type
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, flooring
Weight: 0.52
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.75
, teak
Weight: 0.71
, ash
Weight: 0.61
, ebony
Weight: 0.50
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than softwoods 1.00
be stronger than softwoods 0.97
be more expensive than softwoods 0.97
be harder than softwoods 0.96
be called hardwoods 0.82
be stronger than softwood 0.81
be better than softwood 0.80
be more expensive than softwood 0.80
be different from softwood 0.76
be better than laminate 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hardwood, be called hardwoods)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be called hardwoods)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hardwood, be called hardwoods)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hardwood, be different from softwood)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than laminate)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be better than laminate)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(hardwood, be different from softwood)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better than laminate)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be different from softwood)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be different from softwood)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be called hardwoods)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better than laminate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)