hardwood: be better than softwood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surface
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.59
, type
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.54
, flooring
Weight: 0.52
Siblings mahogany
Weight: 0.75
, teak
Weight: 0.71
, ash
Weight: 0.61
, ebony
Weight: 0.50
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than softwood 1.00
be stronger than softwood 0.98
be more expensive than softwood 0.98
be different from softwood 0.98
be better than softwoods 0.80
be stronger than softwoods 0.80
be harder than softwoods 0.79
be more expensive than softwoods 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be different from softwood)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(hardwood, be different from softwood)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hardwood, be different from softwood)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwood)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be different from softwood)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(hardwood, be more expensive than softwoods)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(hardwood, be stronger than softwoods)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwoods)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be harder than softwoods)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, be better than softwood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(hardwood, be better than softwood)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hardwood, be better than softwood)