hat trick: be called football

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, term
Weight: 0.55
, game
Weight: 0.54
, goal
Weight: 0.54
Siblings sweater
Weight: 0.32
, black magic
Weight: 0.32
, clown
Weight: 0.32
, joke
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called football 1.00
be in hockey 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(goal, be in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hat trick, be called football)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(goal, be in hockey)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(goal, be in hockey)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(goal, be in hockey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hat trick, be called football)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(hat trick, be called football)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(hat trick, be in hockey)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hat trick, be in hockey)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(hat trick, be in hockey)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hat trick, be in hockey)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(hat trick, be called football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(hat trick, be called football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(goal, be in hockey)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(hat trick, be called football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(goal, be in hockey)