hat: be banned at school

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prop
Weight: 0.61
, bag
Weight: 0.59
, shirt
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.58
, type
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sweatshirt
Weight: 0.33
, scarf
Weight: 0.33
, trash bag
Weight: 0.33
, sweater
Weight: 0.33
, towel
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned at school 1.00
be banned in school 0.99
be banned from school 0.98
be banned from schools 0.95
is banned 0.91
be prohibited in school 0.91
be allowed in school 0.83
bans work 0.80
be allowed in schools 0.80
was banned from california 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bag, was banned from california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hat, be banned at school)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(bag, was banned from california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(bag, was banned from california)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(bag, was banned from california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(hat, be banned at school)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hat, be banned at school)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(hat, be banned from school)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(hat, be banned in school)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hat, be banned from schools)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hat, be banned from school)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hat, be banned in school)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hat, be banned at school)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hat, be banned at school)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bag, was banned from california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hat, be banned at school) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bag, was banned from california)