hat: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prop
Weight: 0.61
, bag
Weight: 0.59
, shirt
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.58
, type
Weight: 0.58
Siblings sweatshirt
Weight: 0.33
, scarf
Weight: 0.33
, trash bag
Weight: 0.33
, sweater
Weight: 0.33
, towel
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality evil 0.80
be bad for environment 0.80
is terrible 0.77
dry bad 0.75
be good for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hat, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hat, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bag, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hat, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(shirt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hat, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(bag, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hat, has quality bad)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(bag, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prop, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(shirt, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(bag, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bag, has quality good)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bag, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(prop, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(bag, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bag, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(shirt, has quality good)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trash bag, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(towel, is terrible)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(scarf, has quality evil)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sweater, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(towel, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hat, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(bag, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hat, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(bag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hat, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(shirt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hat, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(bag, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hat, has quality bad)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(towel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(towel, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sweater, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sweater, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(trash bag, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(trash bag, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(scarf, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(scarf, has quality evil)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(towel, is terrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(towel, is terrible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hat, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(hat, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hat, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(hat, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hat, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(shirt, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bag, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(prop, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bag, be bad for environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bag, has quality good)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(trash bag, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(towel, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweater, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(towel, is terrible)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(scarf, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(shirt, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(bag, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(prop, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bag, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bag, be bad for environment)
...