head: be better than one

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents leader
Weight: 0.66
, body part
Weight: 0.64
, target
Weight: 0.61
, step
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chief
Weight: 0.62
, concussion
Weight: 0.61
, wig
Weight: 0.54
, arm
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than one 1.00
be more likely than tails 0.80
be more popular 0.78
is more dangerous 0.77
be better than walmart 0.76
be more expensive than walmart 0.75
be better than fury 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(head, be better than one)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(target, be more expensive than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(head, be better than one)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(target, be better than walmart)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(target, be more expensive than walmart)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(target, be more expensive than walmart)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(target, be better than walmart)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(target, be better than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(head, be better than one)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(target, be more expensive than walmart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(head, be better than one)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(head, be better than one)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(head, be more likely than tails)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(head, be more popular)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(head, is more dangerous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(head, be more popular)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(head, be more likely than tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(head, is more dangerous)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(head, be more likely than tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(head, be more popular)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(head, is more dangerous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(head, be more likely than tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(head, is more dangerous)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(head, be more popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(head, be better than one)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(head, be better than one)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be better than walmart)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(target, be more expensive than walmart)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(target, be better than walmart)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(head, be better than one) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(target, be more expensive than walmart)