health insurance: be beneficial to person

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insurance
Weight: 0.73
, coverage
Weight: 0.71
, protection
Weight: 0.71
, retirement
Weight: 0.70
, service
Weight: 0.68
Siblings postal service
Weight: 0.35
, hospital care
Weight: 0.35
, mortgage
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.34
, escort service
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be beneficial to person 1.00
be beneficial 0.91
be important to person 0.89
be higher for person 0.78
be beneficial to firms 0.77
be useful 0.75
be higher for person under 25 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(service, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(health insurance, be beneficial to person)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(retirement, be beneficial to firms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(health insurance, be beneficial to person)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(retirement, be beneficial to firms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(service, be important to person)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(retirement, be beneficial to firms)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mortgage, be useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(service, be important to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be beneficial to person)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(retirement, be beneficial to firms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be beneficial to person)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mortgage, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(mortgage, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(health insurance, be beneficial to person)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(health insurance, be beneficial)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be beneficial)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(health insurance, be beneficial)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial to person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(health insurance, be beneficial to person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(retirement, be beneficial to firms)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be important to person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mortgage, be useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(retirement, be beneficial to firms)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(health insurance, be beneficial to person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be important to person)