service: be important to person

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents escort service
Weight: 0.87
, postal service
Weight: 0.82
, honor
Weight: 0.62
, delivery
Weight: 0.58
Siblings service station
Weight: 0.85
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.83
, bar service
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, health insurance
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to person 1.00
be beneficial to person 0.89
be to others important 0.78
was important for men in shakespeares time 0.78
was important for men 0.77
be important in life 0.77
was important to men 0.77
be important in work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be important to person)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(honor, was important for men)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be important to person)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(honor, was important to men)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be important to person)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(honor, was important to men)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(honor, was important for men)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honor, was important for men)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(honor, was important to men)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be important in life)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial to person)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(service, be important to person)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(honor, was important for men)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(service, be important to person)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(honor, was important to men)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(service, be important to person)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(health insurance, be beneficial to person)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be beneficial to person)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(health insurance, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be important in life)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(service, be important to person)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(service, be to others important)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(service, be to others important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, be to others important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be important to person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(honor, was important to men)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(honor, was important for men)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(health insurance, be beneficial to person)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(health insurance, be important in life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(honor, was important to men)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(honor, was important for men)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(service, be important to person)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)