service: be to others important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents escort service
Weight: 0.87
, postal service
Weight: 0.82
, honor
Weight: 0.62
, delivery
Weight: 0.58
Siblings service station
Weight: 0.85
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.83
, bar service
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, health insurance
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to others important 1.00
be to others 0.92
be important in work 0.83
be important in life 0.79
was important for men 0.79
be important to person 0.78
was important to men 0.78
be important to employees 0.78
was important for men in shakespeares time 0.78
be to community important 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, be to others important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(honor, was important for men)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, be to others important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(honor, was important to men)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, be to others important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(honor, was important to men)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(honor, was important for men)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honor, was important for men)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(honor, was important to men)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be important in life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(honor, was important for men)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(service, be to others important)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(service, be to others important)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(honor, was important to men)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(service, be to others important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(health insurance, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be important in life)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be important to employees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(service, be to others important)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(service, be important to person)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(service, be to community important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be important to person)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(service, be important to person)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, be to community important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(service, be to community important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be important to person)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(service, be to community important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, be to others important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(honor, was important to men)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(honor, was important for men)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(health insurance, be important in life)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(health insurance, be important to employees)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(honor, was important to men)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(honor, was important for men)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(honor, was important for men in shakespeares time)