health insurance: be important to employees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insurance
Weight: 0.73
, coverage
Weight: 0.71
, protection
Weight: 0.71
, retirement
Weight: 0.70
, service
Weight: 0.68
Siblings postal service
Weight: 0.35
, hospital care
Weight: 0.35
, mortgage
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.34
, escort service
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to employees 1.00
be to others important 0.78
be important in work 0.76
be in business important 0.76
be important to business 0.76
be important to contractors 0.75
be provided by employers 0.75
be linked to employers 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(insurance, be in business important)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(health insurance, be important to employees)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(health insurance, be important to employees)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(health insurance, be important to employees)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(service, be to others important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(insurance, be in business important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(service, be to others important)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be in business important)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(service, be to others important)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be important to employees)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(insurance, be in business important)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be important to employees)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insurance, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be important to employees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(health insurance, be important to employees)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be provided by employers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(health insurance, be provided by employers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be linked to employers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(health insurance, be linked to employers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(health insurance, be provided by employers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be provided by employers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(health insurance, be linked to employers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be linked to employers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(health insurance, be important to employees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(insurance, be important to business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, be to others important)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(insurance, be in business important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(insurance, be important to business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(service, be to others important)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(health insurance, be important to employees)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(insurance, be in business important)