health insurance: be linked to employers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insurance
Weight: 0.73
, coverage
Weight: 0.71
, protection
Weight: 0.71
, retirement
Weight: 0.70
, service
Weight: 0.68
Siblings postal service
Weight: 0.35
, hospital care
Weight: 0.35
, mortgage
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.34
, escort service
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be linked to employers 1.00
be provided by employers 0.87
go through employer 0.80
be tied to employment 0.76
be important to employees 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(insurance, be tied to employment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(health insurance, be linked to employers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(insurance, be tied to employment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be tied to employment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(insurance, be tied to employment)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be linked to employers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(health insurance, be linked to employers)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be provided by employers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(health insurance, be provided by employers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be provided by employers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(health insurance, be provided by employers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(health insurance, go through employer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, go through employer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(health insurance, go through employer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be important to employees)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(health insurance, go through employer)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(health insurance, be important to employees)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be important to employees)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(health insurance, be important to employees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be linked to employers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(health insurance, be linked to employers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(insurance, be tied to employment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(health insurance, be linked to employers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(insurance, be tied to employment)