health insurance: be more expensive for females

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insurance
Weight: 0.73
, coverage
Weight: 0.71
, protection
Weight: 0.71
, retirement
Weight: 0.70
, service
Weight: 0.68
Siblings postal service
Weight: 0.35
, hospital care
Weight: 0.35
, mortgage
Weight: 0.34
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.34
, escort service
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive for females 1.00
be more expensive for males 0.96
be cheaper for females 0.94
be more expensive for less 0.88
be more expensive for less now 0.87
is more expensive 0.87
be higher for males 0.86
be on more expensive 0.86
get more expensive 0.85
be more expensive in areas 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(insurance, be more expensive for males) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive for females)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive for females)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(insurance, be higher for males) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive for females)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(insurance, be cheaper for females)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(insurance, be more expensive for males)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(insurance, be higher for males)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be more expensive for males)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be cheaper for females)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(insurance, be higher for males)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(insurance, be more expensive for males) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive for females)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(insurance, be cheaper for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive for females)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(insurance, be higher for males) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive for females)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(health insurance, be more expensive for females)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in areas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(health insurance, be more expensive in areas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in areas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in areas)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, get more expensive)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive for females)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(insurance, be more expensive for males)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(insurance, be cheaper for females)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(insurance, be higher for males)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(insurance, be cheaper for females)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(insurance, be more expensive for males)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(health insurance, be more expensive for females) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(insurance, be higher for males)