hearing: be expensive in new zealand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meeting
Weight: 0.67
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.65
, event
Weight: 0.62
, action
Weight: 0.61
, witness
Weight: 0.60
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.34
, memorial day
Weight: 0.32
, appearance
Weight: 0.32
, gathering
Weight: 0.32
, discussion
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in new zealand 1.00
be expensive in zealand 0.98
be expensive in australia 0.84
be expensive in uk 0.83
is expensive uk 0.83
be expensive in canada 0.82
be expensive in usa 0.81
is uk 0.76
be in singapore 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(meeting, be in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in new zealand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(meeting, be in singapore)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(meeting, be in singapore)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(forum, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(meeting, be in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(hearing, be expensive in new zealand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(forum, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(forum, is uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hearing, be expensive in new zealand)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in zealand)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(hearing, be expensive in zealand)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(hearing, be expensive in zealand)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in australia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in uk)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in new zealand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hearing, be expensive in new zealand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(meeting, be in singapore)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(forum, is uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(hearing, be expensive in new zealand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(meeting, be in singapore)