heat pump: be more efficient energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heat
Weight: 0.80
, heating
Weight: 0.65
, technology
Weight: 0.65
, system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings heat sink
Weight: 0.39
, heat stroke
Weight: 0.39
, temperature
Weight: 0.37
, furnace
Weight: 0.37
, blow dryer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient energy 1.00
is more efficient 0.96
is efficient 0.94
need source of energy 0.80
need external source of energy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(heat pump, be more efficient energy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(system, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(system, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(furnace, is more efficient)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(furnace, is efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(heat pump, be more efficient energy)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(heat pump, need source of energy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is efficient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(heat pump, need external source of energy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(heat pump, is efficient)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(heat pump, need source of energy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heat pump, is efficient)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(heat pump, need source of energy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(heat pump, need external source of energy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is efficient)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(heat pump, need external source of energy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, need source of energy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, need external source of energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(heat pump, be more efficient energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(system, is more efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(furnace, is efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(furnace, is more efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(system, is more efficient)