furnace: is efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heat
Weight: 0.68
, material
Weight: 0.60
, gas
Weight: 0.59
, heating
Weight: 0.57
Siblings heat pump
Weight: 0.37
, electric heater
Weight: 0.36
, blow dryer
Weight: 0.35
, water heater
Weight: 0.35
, steam engine
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is efficient 1.00
is more efficient 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(heat pump, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is efficient)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(water heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(heat pump, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is efficient)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(furnace, is efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(furnace, is more efficient)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(furnace, is more efficient)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(furnace, is more efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(furnace, is efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric heater, is efficient)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heat pump, is efficient)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(water heater, is more efficient)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water heater, is efficient)