electric heater: is efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heating
Weight: 0.78
, thermostat
Weight: 0.62
, heater
Weight: 0.62
, device
Weight: 0.62
Siblings water heater
Weight: 0.41
, electric motor
Weight: 0.37
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.36
, heat pump
Weight: 0.36
, furnace
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is efficient 1.00
be 100 efficient 1.00
be efficient 1.00
be efficient 100 1.00
is more efficient 0.97
be more efficient energy 0.94
be efficient 100 percent 0.85
be more efficient than combustion engines 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric heater, is efficient)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(heater, be efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric heater, is efficient)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, be efficient 100) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric heater, is efficient)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric heater, is efficient)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(heater, be efficient 100 percent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric heater, is efficient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(device, be efficient 100)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(heater, be efficient)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(heater, is efficient)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(heater, be efficient 100 percent)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(device, be efficient 100)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(heater, be efficient)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(heater, is efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is efficient)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(electric motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is efficient)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(heater, be efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is efficient)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, be efficient 100) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is efficient)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is efficient)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(heater, be efficient 100 percent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(furnace, is efficient)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(heat pump, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is efficient)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(furnace, is more efficient)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(water heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(heat pump, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(electric motor, be more efficient than combustion engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(electric motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(electric heater, is efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(electric heater, be efficient)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric heater, is efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(device, be efficient 100)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(heater, is efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(furnace, is efficient)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(heat pump, be more efficient energy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(furnace, is more efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heat pump, is efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water heater, is efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(water heater, is more efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(electric motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(device, be efficient 100)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(heater, is efficient)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(electric heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient 100 percent)