electric heater: be 100 efficient

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heating
Weight: 0.78
, thermostat
Weight: 0.62
, heater
Weight: 0.62
, device
Weight: 0.62
Siblings water heater
Weight: 0.41
, electric motor
Weight: 0.37
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.36
, heat pump
Weight: 0.36
, furnace
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be 100 efficient 1.00
be efficient 1.00
be efficient 100 1.00
is efficient 1.00
is more efficient 0.97
be more efficient energy 0.94
be efficient 100 percent 0.85
be more efficient than combustion engines 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(heater, be efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, be efficient 100) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(heater, be efficient 100 percent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(device, be efficient 100)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(heater, be efficient)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(heater, is efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(device, be efficient 100)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(heater, be efficient)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(heater, is efficient)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(heater, be efficient 100 percent)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is efficient)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(electric motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(heater, be efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, be efficient 100) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(heater, be efficient 100 percent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(furnace, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(furnace, is efficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(furnace, is more efficient)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(heat pump, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is efficient)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(heat pump, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(water heater, is efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(electric motor, be more efficient than combustion engines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(electric motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(electric heater, be 100 efficient)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric heater, is efficient)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(electric heater, be efficient)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is efficient)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(electric heater, is efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(device, be efficient 100)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(heater, is efficient)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient 100 percent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(furnace, is efficient)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heat pump, is efficient)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water heater, is efficient)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(furnace, is more efficient)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(water heater, is more efficient)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(heat pump, be more efficient energy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(electric motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(device, be efficient 100)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(heater, is efficient)