electric heater: be efficient 100 percent

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heating
Weight: 0.78
, thermostat
Weight: 0.62
, heater
Weight: 0.62
, device
Weight: 0.62
Siblings water heater
Weight: 0.41
, electric motor
Weight: 0.37
, electric toothbrush
Weight: 0.36
, heat pump
Weight: 0.36
, furnace
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be efficient 100 percent 1.00
be 100 efficient 0.85
be efficient 0.85
be efficient 100 0.85
is more efficient 0.85
is efficient 0.85
be more efficient energy 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(heater, be efficient)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, be efficient 100)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(heater, be 100 efficient)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(device, be efficient 100)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(heater, be efficient)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(heater, is efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(device, be efficient 100)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(heater, be efficient)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(heater, is efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(heater, be efficient)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(device, be efficient 100)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(heater, be 100 efficient)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(furnace, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(furnace, is efficient)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(furnace, is more efficient)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(heat pump, be more efficient energy)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heat pump, be more efficient energy)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(heat pump, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is efficient)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(heat pump, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(water heater, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(water heater, is efficient)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(water heater, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(water heater, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(electric heater, be 100 efficient)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, is efficient)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(electric heater, is efficient)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electric heater, be efficient)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(electric heater, be efficient)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(electric heater, is efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(electric heater, is efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(device, be efficient 100)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(heater, is efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(furnace, is more efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(furnace, is efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(water heater, is more efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(heat pump, is efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(water heater, is efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(heat pump, be more efficient energy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient 100 percent)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(heater, be 100 efficient)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(device, be efficient 100)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(heater, be efficient)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(electric heater, be efficient 100 percent)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(heater, is efficient)