heat pump: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heat
Weight: 0.80
, heating
Weight: 0.65
, technology
Weight: 0.65
, system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings heat sink
Weight: 0.39
, heat stroke
Weight: 0.39
, temperature
Weight: 0.37
, furnace
Weight: 0.37
, blow dryer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is more efficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(heat pump, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(heat pump, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(heating, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(system, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(system, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(system, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(furnace, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(furnace, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(furnace, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(heat pump, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is more efficient)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is more efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(heat pump, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heating, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(system, is more efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(furnace, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(furnace, is more efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heating, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(heat pump, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(system, is more efficient)