heating: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ventilation system
Weight: 0.66
, need
Weight: 0.65
, variable
Weight: 0.61
, cost
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.59
Siblings furnace
Weight: 0.57
, heater
Weight: 0.35
, plumbing
Weight: 0.33
, air conditioning
Weight: 0.33
, insulation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
has quality cost 0.77
be expensive cooling 0.76
is inefficient 0.76
is more efficient 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heating, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality cost)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality cost)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(insulation, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heater, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(plumbing, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, is inefficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(heating, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(air conditioning, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(furnace, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(furnace, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(plumbing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(plumbing, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(insulation, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(insulation, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(heater, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(heater, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(furnace, is more efficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(furnace, is more efficient)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(air conditioning, is inefficient) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, is inefficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(heating, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(heating, be expensive cooling)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(heating, be expensive cooling)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(heating, be expensive cooling)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(heating, be expensive cooling)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(heating, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plumbing, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(furnace, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(insulation, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(heater, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(air conditioning, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(furnace, is more efficient)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(air conditioning, is inefficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(heating, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)