heat pump: keep running

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heat
Weight: 0.80
, heating
Weight: 0.65
, technology
Weight: 0.65
, system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings heat sink
Weight: 0.39
, heat stroke
Weight: 0.39
, temperature
Weight: 0.37
, furnace
Weight: 0.37
, blow dryer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
keep running 1.00
run time 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(furnace, keep running)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(furnace, run time)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(furnace, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(furnace, keep running)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(furnace, run time) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(furnace, run time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(heat pump, keep running)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(heat pump, run time)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(heat pump, run time)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, run time)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(heat pump, run time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, keep running)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(heat pump, keep running)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(furnace, keep running)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, keep running) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(furnace, run time)