hemolysis: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	red blood cell Weight: 0.54 , condition Weight: 0.44 , factor Weight: 0.43 , problem Weight: 0.42 , damage Weight: 0.40
Siblings	sickle cell anemia Weight: 0.34 , hemolytic anemia Weight: 0.32 , cystic fibrosis Weight: 0.31 , macular degeneration Weight: 0.31 , pulmonary edema Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality worse	0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

Remarkable(pulmonary edema, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(hemolysis, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(hemolysis, has quality worse)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(hemolysis, has quality worse)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(hemolysis, has quality worse)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(hemolysis, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(hemolysis, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(hemolysis, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(hemolysis, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(pulmonary edema, has quality bad)