hickey: be seen as bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.47
, film
Weight: 0.47
, thing
Weight: 0.42
, mark
Weight: 0.39
, band
Weight: 0.37
Siblings old man
Weight: 0.30
, young woman
Weight: 0.30
, dick
Weight: 0.30
, boy george
Weight: 0.30
, young man
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be seen as bad 1.00
look bad 0.81
is bad thing 0.80
hurt bad 0.78
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hickey, be seen as bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(band, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(hickey, be seen as bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(hickey, be seen as bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(hickey, look bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(hickey, look bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hickey, look bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(hickey, look bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hickey, hurt bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(hickey, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hickey, is bad thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(hickey, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(hickey, hurt bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(hickey, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(hickey, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(hickey, hurt bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(hickey, hurt bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(hickey, is bad thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(hickey, is bad thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(hickey, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hickey, be seen as bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(hickey, be seen as bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(hickey, be seen as bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)