hockey player: blowtorch sticks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.79
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, player
Weight: 0.64
, team
Weight: 0.60
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.87
, goalie
Weight: 0.64
, football player
Weight: 0.42
, tennis player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
blowtorch sticks 1.00
burn sticks 0.82
heat sticks 0.81
wax sticks 0.78
use blow torches 0.78
put wax on sticks 0.78
paint sticks 0.77
tape sticks 0.75
put tape on sticks 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, blowtorch sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(goalie, tape sticks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey player, blowtorch sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(goalie, tape sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(goalie, tape sticks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey player, blowtorch sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(hockey player, blowtorch sticks)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey player, blowtorch sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(hockey player, burn sticks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hockey player, blowtorch sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, burn sticks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(hockey player, blowtorch sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(hockey player, burn sticks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(hockey player, blowtorch sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(hockey player, put wax on sticks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey player, blowtorch sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hockey player, put wax on sticks)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(hockey player, blowtorch sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hockey player, blowtorch sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, blowtorch sticks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey player, blowtorch sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hockey player, blowtorch sticks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, blowtorch sticks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(goalie, tape sticks)