hockey player: use blow torches

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents athlete
Weight: 0.79
, sport
Weight: 0.67
, player
Weight: 0.64
, team
Weight: 0.60
Siblings basketball player
Weight: 0.87
, goalie
Weight: 0.64
, football player
Weight: 0.42
, tennis player
Weight: 0.42
, soccer player
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
use blow torches 1.00
burn sticks 0.78
blowtorch sticks 0.78
heat sticks 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(hockey player, use blow torches)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(hockey player, blowtorch sticks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, blowtorch sticks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hockey player, blowtorch sticks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, burn sticks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(hockey player, burn sticks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(hockey player, burn sticks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hockey player, blowtorch sticks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(hockey player, burn sticks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, heat sticks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(hockey player, heat sticks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hockey player, heat sticks)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(hockey player, heat sticks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, use blow torches)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(hockey player, use blow torches) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(hockey player, use blow torches)