hockey: be better than basketball

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than basketball 1.00
be better than football 0.91
be better than soccer 0.91
be better today 0.77
be called hockey 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(hockey, be better than basketball)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hockey, be better than football)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(hockey, be better than football)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be better than football)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hockey, be better than soccer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(hockey, be better than soccer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be better than soccer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hockey, be better than football)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hockey, be better than soccer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(hockey, be called hockey)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be better today)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(hockey, be better today)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(hockey, be better today)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hockey, be called hockey)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hockey, be better today)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(hockey, be called hockey)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be called hockey)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be better than basketball)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(hockey, be better than basketball) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hockey, be better than basketball)