hockey: be better than football

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than football 1.00
be better than soccer 0.93
be better than basketball 0.91
be better today 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(hockey, be better than football)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hockey, be better than soccer)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(hockey, be better than soccer)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be better than soccer)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(hockey, be better than basketball)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(hockey, be better than basketball)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be better than basketball)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(hockey, be better than soccer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hockey, be better than basketball)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be better today)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(hockey, be better today)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(hockey, be better today)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(hockey, be better today)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be better than football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(hockey, be better than football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(hockey, be better than football)