hockey: was formed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents game
Weight: 0.63
, sport
Weight: 0.63
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.57
, sports equipment
Weight: 0.57
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.41
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.39
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, play hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was formed 1.00
was created 0.84
was developed 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, was created)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ice hockey, was created) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, was created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(hockey, was formed)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was developed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hockey, was created)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(hockey, was developed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hockey, was created)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hockey, was developed)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(hockey, was created)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hockey, was developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was formed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(hockey, was formed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hockey, was formed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ice hockey, was created)