hog: has physical part tusks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.61
, food
Weight: 0.55
, cattle
Weight: 0.52
, creature
Weight: 0.51
, industry
Weight: 0.50
Siblings pig
Weight: 0.35
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.35
, piglet
Weight: 0.34
, cow
Weight: 0.34
, turkey
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tusks 1.00
has physical part horns 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cattle, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hog, has physical part tusks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cattle, has physical part horns)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(cattle, has physical part horns)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part horns)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(cattle, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hog, has physical part tusks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(pig, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(pig, has physical part tusks)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(cow, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part horns)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(hog, has physical part tusks)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(hog, has physical part horns)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hog, has physical part horns)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(hog, has physical part horns)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(hog, has physical part horns)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hog, has physical part tusks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hog, has physical part tusks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cattle, has physical part horns)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part tusks)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part horns)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hog, has physical part tusks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cattle, has physical part horns)