home: be in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.61
, visit
Weight: 0.60
, facility
Weight: 0.59
, possession
Weight: 0.58
Siblings home depot
Weight: 0.70
, hotel room
Weight: 0.69
, home owner
Weight: 0.66
, condominium
Weight: 0.62
, bungalow
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in canada 1.00
cost in canada 0.93
cost in more canada 0.91
be in uk 0.85
is uk 0.84
india 0.82
planting in canada 0.82
buy in uk 0.81
be big deal in australia 0.78
be in europe 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(visit, india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(home, be in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(visit, india)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(visit, india)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(home owner, is uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, be in europe)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(visit, india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(home, be in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(home owner, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(home owner, is uk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hotel room, be in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(hotel room, be in europe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(home, be in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(home, be in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(home, be in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(visit, india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(home owner, is uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(hotel room, be in europe)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(home, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(visit, india)