homework: has quality benefit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, time
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, hard work
Weight: 0.57
Siblings nap
Weight: 0.33
, housework
Weight: 0.33
, grammar school
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality benefit 1.00
has quality good 0.83
has quality bad 0.79
have value 0.77
is beneficial 0.76
improve because of technology 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(homework, has quality benefit)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hard work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(homework, has quality benefit)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hard work, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hard work, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(nap, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nap, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grammar school, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(nap, is beneficial)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(homework, has quality benefit)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hard work, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(homework, has quality benefit)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(grammar school, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(grammar school, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nap, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(nap, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(nap, is beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(nap, is beneficial)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(nap, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(nap, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(homework, has quality benefit)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(homework, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(homework, have value)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(homework, is beneficial)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(homework, improve because of technology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(homework, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(homework, have value)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(homework, improve because of technology)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(homework, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(homework, is beneficial)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(homework, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(homework, improve because of technology)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(homework, is beneficial)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(homework, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(homework, have value)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(homework, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(homework, is beneficial)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(homework, have value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(homework, has quality benefit)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hard work, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(nap, is beneficial)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nap, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(grammar school, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(nap, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(hard work, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(homework, has quality benefit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)