homework: improve because of technology

Related concepts

Parents	thing Weight: 0.59 , time Weight: 0.59 , activity Weight: 0.58 , resource Weight: 0.58 , hard work Weight: 0.57
Siblings	nap Weight: 0.33 , housework Weight: 0.33 , grammar school Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
improve because of technology	1.00
improve learning	0.82
enhance academic skills	0.77
improve memory	0.76
has quality good	0.75
has quality benefit	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(homework, improve because of technology)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(hard work, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(homework, improve because of technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(hard work, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(hard work, has quality good)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(nap, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(grammar school, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(homework, improve because of technology)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

Plausible(hard work, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(homework, improve because of technology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(grammar school, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(grammar school, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(nap, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(nap, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(homework, improve because of technology)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(homework, improve learning)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(homework, enhance academic skills)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(homework, improve memory)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(homework, improve learning)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality benefit)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(homework, improve learning)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(homework, enhance academic skills)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(homework, improve memory)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Salient(homework, improve memory)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(homework, enhance academic skills)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(homework, has quality benefit)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(homework, improve learning)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(homework, has quality benefit)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(homework, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(homework, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(homework, has quality benefit)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(homework, improve memory)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(homework, enhance academic skills)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(homework, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(homework, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Salient(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(homework, improve because of technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(hard work, has quality good)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(grammar school, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(nap, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(hard work, has quality good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(homework, improve because of technology) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(time, has quality good)