honda: has quality services

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motorcycle
Weight: 0.69
, brand
Weight: 0.62
, bike
Weight: 0.58
, vehicle
Weight: 0.58
, competitor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings mercedes benz
Weight: 0.71
, honda civic
Weight: 0.65
, subaru
Weight: 0.36
, toyota
Weight: 0.36
, nissan
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality services 1.00
is financial services 0.86
is services closed 0.83
is financial services closed 0.82
has quality good 0.80
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bike, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(honda, has quality services)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(honda, has quality services)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(motorcycle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(honda, has quality services)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(brand, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bike, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(motorcycle, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bike, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(brand, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(subaru, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nissan, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(subaru, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(nissan, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(honda civic, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(bike, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(honda, has quality services)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(brand, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(honda, has quality services)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(motorcycle, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(honda, has quality services)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(honda civic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(honda civic, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(nissan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(nissan, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(toyota, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(toyota, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(subaru, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(subaru, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nissan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(nissan, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(subaru, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(subaru, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(honda, has quality services)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(honda, is services closed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(honda, is services closed)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(honda, is services closed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(honda, is financial services closed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(honda, is financial services closed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(honda, is financial services closed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(honda, is financial services)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(honda, is financial services)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(honda, is services closed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(honda, is financial services closed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(honda, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(honda, is financial services)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(honda, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(honda, is financial services)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(honda, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(honda, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(honda, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(honda, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(honda, has quality services)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(motorcycle, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bike, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(subaru, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(honda civic, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(nissan, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(nissan, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(subaru, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(brand, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(bike, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(honda, has quality services) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(motorcycle, has quality bad)