honeybee: be called honeybees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.61
, bee
Weight: 0.59
, animal
Weight: 0.56
, wildlife
Weight: 0.47
, honey
Weight: 0.46
Siblings honey bees
Weight: 0.36
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.35
, beetle
Weight: 0.35
, housefly
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called honeybees 1.00
kill honeybees after copulation 0.86
be more efficient pollinators than bees 0.85
be more efficient pollinators than other bees 0.85
pollinating food crops 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(honey bees, pollinating food crops)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(honey bees, pollinating food crops)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(honey bees, pollinating food crops)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(honeybee, be called honeybees)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, kill honeybees after copulation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than other bees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(honeybee, kill honeybees after copulation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, pollinating food crops)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than other bees)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(honeybee, pollinating food crops)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(honeybee, pollinating food crops)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(honeybee, kill honeybees after copulation)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than other bees)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(honeybee, pollinating food crops)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(honeybee, kill honeybees after copulation)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than other bees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be called honeybees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(honeybee, be called honeybees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be called honeybees)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(honey bees, pollinating food crops)