honeybee: be more efficient pollinators than bees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.61
, bee
Weight: 0.59
, animal
Weight: 0.56
, wildlife
Weight: 0.47
, honey
Weight: 0.46
Siblings honey bees
Weight: 0.36
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.35
, beetle
Weight: 0.35
, housefly
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient pollinators than bees 1.00
be more efficient pollinators than other bees 1.00
be called honeybees 0.85
pollinating food crops 0.83
kill honeybees after copulation 0.80
is species 0.76
is invasive species 0.76
be important to crops 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(beetle, is invasive species)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(honey bees, pollinating food crops)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(honey bees, pollinating food crops)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(honey bees, pollinating food crops)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(beetle, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(beetle, is invasive species)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than other bees)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than other bees)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than other bees)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(honeybee, be called honeybees)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(honeybee, be called honeybees)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(honeybee, pollinating food crops)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(honeybee, be called honeybees)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(honeybee, pollinating food crops)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(honeybee, pollinating food crops)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than other bees)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(honeybee, kill honeybees after copulation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(honeybee, kill honeybees after copulation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(honeybee, is species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(honeybee, is species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(honeybee, is species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(honeybee, kill honeybees after copulation)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(honeybee, is invasive species)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(honeybee, be important to crops)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(honeybee, is invasive species)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(honeybee, be important to crops)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(honeybee, is invasive species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(honeybee, be important to crops)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, kill honeybees after copulation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, pollinating food crops)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be called honeybees)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be important to crops)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, is invasive species)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, is species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(honey bees, pollinating food crops)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(honeybee, be more efficient pollinators than bees)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beetle, is invasive species)