hood: was good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.62
, place
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.58
, body part
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
Siblings windshield wiper
Weight: 0.34
, headlight
Weight: 0.33
, car battery
Weight: 0.33
, roof
Weight: 0.33
, car alarm
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good 1.00
has quality good 0.84
was out 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hood, was good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(hood, was good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(hood, was good)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(hood, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hood, was out)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(hood, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(hood, was out)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(hood, was out)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hood, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(hood, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(hood, was out)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hood, was good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(hood, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(hood, was good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)