horse: be big and smelly

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, pet
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.62
Siblings donkey
Weight: 0.68
, pony
Weight: 0.67
, mustang
Weight: 0.67
, goat
Weight: 0.65
, cart
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be big and smelly 1.00
be big 0.79
be big or small 0.77
has big schlongs 0.77
poop 0.77
be very big 0.76
be fun but big respondsibility 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(animal, poop)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(horse, be big and smelly)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be big or small)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(horse, be big and smelly)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(horse, be big and smelly)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be big or small)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(animal, poop)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(animal, poop)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(animal, be big or small)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(donkey, poop)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pony, poop)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be big or small)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(horse, be big and smelly)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(animal, poop)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(horse, be big and smelly)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(horse, be big and smelly)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(donkey, poop)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(donkey, poop)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(pony, poop)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pony, poop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(horse, be big and smelly)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(horse, be big)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(horse, be very big)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(horse, be big)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(horse, be very big)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(horse, be big)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(horse, be very big)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(horse, be very big)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(horse, be big and smelly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, poop)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(animal, be big or small)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pony, poop)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(donkey, poop)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(animal, poop)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(animal, be big or small)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(horse, be big and smelly)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pet, be fun but big respondsibility)