hot chocolate: be called hot chocolate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.73
, drink
Weight: 0.72
, snack
Weight: 0.72
, chocolate
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.67
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.41
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.40
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.39
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called hot chocolate 1.00
be called chocolate 0.95
is hot 0.84
have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chocolate, be called chocolate)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(drink, is hot)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, is hot)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be called chocolate)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, is hot)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(drink, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is hot)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(drink, is hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be called chocolate)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, be called chocolate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(chocolate, be called chocolate)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(drink, is hot)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, is hot)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(white chocolate, be called chocolate)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(white chocolate, be called chocolate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called chocolate)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be called chocolate)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, is hot)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, is hot)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, be called chocolate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(hot chocolate, be called chocolate)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, is hot)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(hot chocolate, is hot)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(chocolate, be called chocolate)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drink, is hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dessert, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(white chocolate, be called chocolate)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(chocolate, be called chocolate)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drink, is hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dessert, is hot)