hot chocolate: have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk

Related concepts

Parents	dessert Weight: 0.73 , drink Weight: 0.72 , snack Weight: 0.72 , chocolate Weight: 0.67 , food Weight: 0.67
Siblings	chocolate cake Weight: 0.41 , chocolate milk Weight: 0.40 , chocolate bar Weight: 0.39 , white chocolate Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk	1.00
be called hot chocolate	0.82
be called chocolate	0.80
be more expensive than coffee	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(chocolate, be called hot chocolate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(chocolate, be called chocolate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(chocolate, be called chocolate)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be called chocolate)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, be called chocolate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(chocolate, be called hot chocolate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(chocolate, be called chocolate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(white chocolate, be called chocolate) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(white chocolate, be called chocolate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be called chocolate)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, be called chocolate)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Salient(hot chocolate, be called chocolate)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be called chocolate)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(chocolate, be called chocolate)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(white chocolate, be called chocolate)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(chocolate, be called chocolate)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(chocolate, be called hot chocolate)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.51

Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)