hot chocolate: be more expensive than coffee

Related concepts

Parents	dessert Weight: 0.73 , drink Weight: 0.72 , snack Weight: 0.72 , chocolate Weight: 0.67 , food Weight: 0.67
Siblings	chocolate cake Weight: 0.41 , chocolate milk Weight: 0.40 , chocolate bar Weight: 0.39 , white chocolate Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more expensive than coffee	1.00
have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.55

Remarkable(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, have more thermal energy than cold chocolate milk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Typical(hot chocolate, be more expensive than coffee) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(chocolate, be more expensive than coffee)