hot chocolate: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.73
, drink
Weight: 0.72
, snack
Weight: 0.72
, chocolate
Weight: 0.67
, food
Weight: 0.67
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.41
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.40
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.39
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(chocolate, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chocolate, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(white chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(white chocolate, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(hot chocolate, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(white chocolate, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(chocolate, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(hot chocolate, has quality good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)