hot dog: be important to chicago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to chicago 1.00
be famous to chicago 0.96
be in toronto 0.79
be important in italy 0.78
be important to italy 0.77
be in usa 0.77
england italy fro 0.77
be in usa different 0.77
be expensive in perth 0.75
be in italy better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pizza, england italy fro)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be important in italy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be important to italy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(pizza, england italy fro) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pizza, england italy fro)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(pizza, be important in italy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pizza, be important in italy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pizza, be important to italy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pizza, be important to italy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hot dog, be important to chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hot dog, be famous to chicago)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be famous to chicago)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(hot dog, be famous to chicago)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be famous to chicago)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be important to chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hot dog, be important to chicago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pizza, england italy fro)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pizza, be important in italy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be important to chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pizza, be important to italy)