hot dog: is dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dangerous 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hot dog, is dangerous)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fast food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hot dog, is dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fast food, is dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(junk food, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is dangerous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(junk food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is dangerous)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fast food, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(hot dog, is dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(hot dog, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fast food, is dangerous)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(fast food, is dangerous)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(hot dog, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk food, is dangerous)