hot dog: is sandwich

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is sandwich 1.00
is pizza stock 0.78
is better then hamburgers 0.77
more filling than cold pizza 0.77
be in pizza hut 0.77
have pizza boxes 0.77
be in pizza hut processed 0.76
be different from sausages 0.76
be better than hamburgers 0.76
is tasty 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fast food, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hot dog, is sandwich)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(junk food, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hot dog, is sandwich)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(animal fat, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hot dog, is sandwich)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(animal fat, is tasty)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(junk food, is tasty)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fast food, is tasty)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is tasty)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is tasty)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(animal fat, is tasty)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(twinkies, is tasty)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be in pizza hut processed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is tasty)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fast food, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(junk food, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(animal fat, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pizza, be in pizza hut processed)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(twinkies, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(twinkies, is tasty)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(pizza, is tasty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pizza, is tasty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(hot dog, is sandwich)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be different from sausages)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(hot dog, be different from sausages)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be different from sausages)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(hot dog, be different from sausages)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(hot dog, be better than hamburgers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hot dog, is better then hamburgers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is better then hamburgers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be better than hamburgers)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be better than hamburgers)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is better then hamburgers)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(hot dog, be better than hamburgers)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(hot dog, is better then hamburgers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(hot dog, is sandwich)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(animal fat, is tasty)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fast food, is tasty)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, is tasty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pizza, be in pizza hut processed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(twinkies, is tasty)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pizza, is tasty)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(animal fat, is tasty)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fast food, is tasty)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(hot dog, is sandwich) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(junk food, is tasty)