pizza: be in pizza hut processed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.68
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.68
, frozen food
Weight: 0.66
, junk food
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.66
Siblings hamburger
Weight: 0.37
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, burrito
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.36
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in pizza hut processed 1.00
be in pizza hut 0.94
is pizza 0.83
be called pizza 0.83
be like pizza 0.82
have pizza boxes 0.82
be like pizza called 0.81
be named pizza 0.80
be better than pizza 0.80
is best pizza 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pizza, be in pizza hut processed)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pizza, be in pizza hut processed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fast food, be like pizza called)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fast food, be like pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be like pizza called)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be like pizza)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be better than pizza)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pizza, be in pizza hut processed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fast food, be like pizza called) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pizza, be in pizza hut processed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hamburger, be better than pizza) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be better than pizza)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(pizza, be in pizza hut processed)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pizza, be called pizza)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pizza, be called pizza)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pizza, be called pizza)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be called pizza)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be in pizza hut processed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pizza, be in pizza hut processed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza called)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hamburger, be better than pizza)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(pizza, be in pizza hut processed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, be like pizza called)